[Settfa] [Set Theory]Wednesday 15 Oct, Rosemary A. Bailey and Peter J. Cameron
Adam Bartoš
bartos at math.cas.cz
Sun Oct 12 10:37:14 CEST 2025
Please note the special place and time. This is a joint seminar with
Seminar on Reckoning.
Dne 12.10.2025 v 10:00 kubis at math.cas.cz napsal(a):
> Set Theory and Analysis
>
> Wednesday, 15 October 2025 - 11:00 to 14:00
> Place: blue lecture hall, ground floor, rear building
>
> Speaker: Rosemary A. Bailey and Peter J. Cameron, University of St Andrews
> Title: Permutation groups, lattices and orthogonal block structures
>
> Abstract
>
> The story began when our coauthor Marina was doing an undergraduate
> research internship under Peter's supervision. We were studying
> transitive but imprimitive permutation groups through their invariant
> equivalence relations, and were looking at the case where the
> equivalence relations commute; in our shared office, Rosemary
> overheard our conversation, and said, "Statisticians know about those
> things; we call them orthogonal block structures."
>
> An orthogonal block structure (OBS) is a lattice of commuting uniform
> equivalence relations. These are combinatorial objects which may have
> trivialautomorphism group. Latin squares provide many examples of
> OBSs. We will discuss the history of how OBSs arose in experimental
> design.
>
> A better behaved special case occurs when the lattice is distributive;
> these are called poset block structures. They always have a large
> automorphism group, a generalised wreath product of symmetric groups,
> described by a poset with a set attached at each of its points. Our
> main results are a proof that a group preserving a poset block
> structure is contained in a generalised wreath product of permutation
> groups defined from the action (an extension of the Krasner-Kaloujnine
> theorem), and that a generalised wreath product over a poset is the
> intersection of the iterated wreath products of the same groups over
> all linear extensions of the poset.
>
> In terms of the group operation, so that the graph is invariant under
> all automorphisms of the group. The classical example is the commuting
> graph of a group, defined by Brauer and Fowler in a seminal paper in 1955.
>
> There has been a lot of work on this topic recently. My interests are
> mainly in how the theories of groups and graphs can help one another.
> Some of the questions I will address are
>
> - finding new results about groups;
>
> - characterising important classes of groups using graphs;
>
> - recognising graphs obtained from groups and, if possible,
> reconstructing the groups;
>
> - finding some beautiful graphs.
>
> Recently I have widened the investigation to simplicial complexes
> defined on groups; I will present a small amount of new material and
> some open problems on this also.
>
>
> For more information see the seminar web page at
> https://www.math.cas.cz/index.php/events/seminar/6
>
> Set Theory and Analysis mailing list
> settfa at math.cas.cz
> https://list.math.cas.cz/listinfo/settfa@math.cas.cz
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Settfa mailing list
> Settfa at math.cas.cz
> https://list.math.cas.cz/listinfo/settfa
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.math.cas.cz/pipermail/settfa/attachments/20251012/889d19ad/attachment.html>
More information about the Settfa
mailing list